Thursday 14 November 2013

Similarities and/or differences of techniques for interpellating your demographic

There are several different techniques of hailing people to consume products but none of them seem to reflect well on the consumer. These techniques seemingly bank on the sheep-like nature of the consumer, suggesting that we as consumers will buy anything that is labelled trendy. As far as I am concerned, the way that these advertisers attempt to hail us speaks to our current social nature and there is nothing positive about it.
Apart from a handful of campaigns, advertisers rarely highlight the good in people; they go to great lengths to highlight the bad and offer a product to ‘fix’ what is deemed to be the problem. Advertising aimed at women is the biggest culprit of this, and statements like “women nowadays are not use to being told they are beautiful by advertising1” do not seem unusual. Advertisers seemingly seek to create insecure consumers in order to sell them products which will ultimately offer them the security they once had. This may explain, at least to some degree, the mental health problems that are present today and the overall lack of self-esteem that is seen more often now, especially in females.  
Advertisers and media do not always seek to diminish everyone’s self-esteem; sometimes it is only a select few that they target. Historically, light skinned people have been labelled better than those with dark skin; slavery is the most extreme example of this but hints of this ideal are still present today. Television programs and advertisements are a main source of this thought, leading people to “believe that fair skinned is beautiful since ‘the television programs focus on individual starts and personalities’ who are mostly light skinned.2” It can be argued that there are subtle or blatant hints of racism present in media, advertising and ultimately the world, but it cannot be argued that people are being degraded in advertisements.
When advertisers are not targeting consumer’s individual sense of self-esteem, they use the social setting to try to coerce the public to consume their product. Quite often the idea of being left out of social circles is used to gather support for a product which leads to social groups built on what products its members consume. Advertisers assume that these group settings have immense control over people, particularly young people, and lead to advertisements that say things like “my skin is softer right away, even my friends notice.3” Setting up these little social groups based on product consumption is creating more blind consumers because they become accustomed to buying things simply to conform to the group expectations.
As evidenced above, advertiser’s view of their consumers, particularly young people, is quite negative. Various ads show that consumers are viewed as shallow and insecure in that they can be swayed into buying products by commercials and ad campaigns that create problems that can only be fixed by a certain product as well as coerce consumers into buying a certain product by suggesting that we will be ostracized from social groups without it. Personally, I feel these are horrible representations that sadly are at least somewhat accurate; a majority of my peers seem content in simply following trends.
Special thanks to:

No comments:

Post a Comment